An Open Letter to Dr. Dobson
Dear Dr. Dobson,
I
grew up listening to Adventures in Odyssey every night before bed. "Focus
on the Family" were four words that thrilled and gave me a feeling akin to
the famous Disney castle intro – and your name “Dr. James Dobson” was nearly
synonymous. That thrill shriveled and died, with a dust-spewing cough,
yesterday, at around noon.
To
be fair, these views I’m reacting to are ones you’ve held for a long time.
Although, it would seem to make any argument of mine less relevant, I would
propose that the amount of time your words have had to steep and spread
throughout the current Christian culture, makes their reconsideration
imperative. Your influence has been heavy and, in regard to women in the
church, it has been dangerous.
In
your book “Love Must Be Tough”, you address a woman asking for advice who is
being habitually beaten by her husband. Your advice is not – get out, call the
police, don’t become a statistic (as in dead – I’m talking about dead) – your
advice is not to get a divorce. You continue, “I would suggest that Laura choose the most
absurd demand her husband makes, and then refuse to consent to it. Let him rage
if he must rage.” (p. 148) This apparently should make him realize he was being
ridiculous and that they need Christian counseling. Not that he would try
to choke her this time, or kill her, or one of their children.
After
advising that Laura poke the bear, you go on to have her further question her
reality by warning against women who get themselves beaten up on purpose.
I
have seen women belittle and berate their husbands until they set aflame with
rage. Some wives are more verbal than their husbands and can win a war of words
any day of the week. Finally, the men reach a point of such frustration that
they explode, doing precisely what their wives were begging them to do in the
first place.
You
are saying the two things that abusive people are well known for telling their
victims. This time I’ll change or it’s all your fault.
This is what keeps women in these situations. This is what keeps them putting
themselves and their children in danger. This is what keeps them dying.
Not to mention that you’re enabling men to continue to beat their
wives by defending it – for whatever reason.
Frankly
it doesn’t matter whether or not you truly believe in this supposed problem of
wives who want to cause themselves physical pain and damage in the ultimate
goal of embarrassing or incriminating their husbands – because men should never
beat up their wives.
Never.
It’s
unbiblical and illegal and wrong.
But
the wrongness of this doesn’t seem to strike you as important enough to give
words to. Rather you give words to the power and influence that women have over
men to make them do things, such as in a little question and answer article
online entitled “A Woman’s God-Given Influence”:
…women do have considerable influence on men when the fit is right
and the attraction is strong. Typically, a man needs a woman more than she
needs him. In fact, she can make or break him.
Otherwise:
…single
men are more inclined to move from job to job, drink too much, drive too fast,
spend money unwisely, and be sexually irresponsible.
Again,
the message – a woman can change a man. A woman can change him from doing bad,
illegal things to doing better. The responsibility is on her shoulders. And
for anyone who thinks you must not really think that, I include your example
story from the same article:
Here’s
a silly little story from my childhood that will illustrate the influence that
a woman (in this case, a girl) holds. ...I was endowed with an abundance
of testosterone as a boy… …When I was fourteen years old, my mother
told me to pick all the cherries off the tree in our backyard… …I set up a
six-foot ladder and began working my way upward...
No.
Laurie did not knock you off your ladder Dr. Dobson. Your pride did. “Pride
goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Proverbs 16:18
ESV.
But according to your statements, in every interaction that a
woman has with a man the burden of responsibility to keep that man from
misbehaving is on her. When she comes into view, when she takes a beating, when
she stops taking a beating. Because if a man misbehaves - a woman made him do
it.
It doesn’t matter if you believe this to be universally true or
not - this is where you are putting effort and energy in communicating with
people.
You are giving men in the church, whose responsibility it is to
keep their eyes in their heads and their hands to themselves, the excuse of
pointing to the wife, daughter, parishioner and saying, like Adam, it’s the
woman you gave me, Lord.
In the meanwhile, women and girls, who have very few recourses,
find that they are not safe in church. Instead they are suspected. They are
maligned. Their reputations are shot. All while the men who abused them are
“gained as a brother” and pitied for the embarrassment of having to deal with
the very notion of having done anything wrong.
If you truly believe in Biblical manhood, stop contributing to a
church culture that hides and sympathizes with abusers. A victim cannot change
an abuser. A victim is not responsible for abuse.
Comments
Post a Comment